42 Chain Integration Roadmap

Date: November 5, 2025 Status: David Bovill approved - expanding from 20 to 42 chains Theme: "42" - The Answer to Life, the Universe, and Everything


Why 42 Chains?

David Bovill's Feedback: "Why only 20 blockchains - why not 42?"

Perfect for Hitchhiker's Guide:

  • 42 is THE answer to everything in H2G2

  • 42 foundations × $42K each = $1,764,000 total funding

  • Covers virtually every major blockchain ecosystem

  • Makes OASIS the most interoperable platform in existence


The 42 Chains - Complete List

Tier 1: COMPLETED (10 Chains) ✓

Already Integrated & Live:

  1. Solana (SOL) - Provider: ✓ Bridge: ✓ Frontend: ✓

  2. Ethereum (ETH) - Provider: ✓ Bridge: ✓ Frontend: ✓

  3. Polygon (MATIC) - Provider: ✓ Bridge: ✓ Frontend: ✓

  4. Base (BASE) - Provider: ✓ Bridge: ✓ Frontend: ✓

  5. Arbitrum (ARB) - Provider: ✓ Bridge: ✓ Frontend: ✓

  6. Optimism (OP) - Provider: ✓ Bridge: Partial Frontend: ✓

  7. BNB Chain (BNB) - Provider: ✓ Bridge: Partial Frontend: ✓

  8. Avalanche (AVAX) - Provider: ✓ Bridge: Partial Frontend: ✓

  9. Fantom (FTM) - Provider: ✓ Bridge: Partial Frontend: ✓

  10. Radix (XRD) - Provider: ✓ Bridge: ✓ Frontend: ✓

Funding Secured (if all join): 10 × $42K = $420,000


Tier 2: EASY - EVM Compatible (15 Chains)

Can copy our Ethereum/Polygon provider patterns:

  1. zkSync Era (ZK) - Layer 2, EVM-compatible

  2. Linea (Consensys) - Layer 2, EVM-compatible

  3. Mantle (MNT) - Layer 2, EVM-compatible

  4. Blast - Layer 2, EVM-compatible

  5. Scroll - Layer 2 zkEVM

  6. Moonbeam (GLMR) - Polkadot EVM parachain

  7. Moonriver (MOVR) - Kusama EVM parachain

  8. Celo (CELO) - Mobile-first EVM chain

  9. Gnosis Chain (GNO) - EVM payments chain

  10. Aurora (NEAR) - NEAR's EVM layer

  11. Cronos (CRO) - Crypto.com chain

  12. Metis - Optimistic rollup

  13. Boba Network - Optimistic rollup

  14. Kava (KAVA) - Cosmos EVM co-chain

  15. Harmony (ONE) - Sharded EVM chain

Integration Effort: LOW (1-2 weeks each) Method: Copy ArbitrumOASIS pattern, change RPC URLs Funding Potential: 15 × $42K = $630,000


Tier 3: MODERATE - Existing OASIS Providers (7 Chains)

We already have providers, need bridge services:

  1. Cardano (ADA) - Provider: ✓ Need: Bridge service

  2. Polkadot (DOT) - Provider: ✓ Need: Bridge service

  3. Cosmos (ATOM) - Provider: ✓ Need: Bridge service

  4. NEAR Protocol (NEAR) - Provider: ✓ Need: Bridge service

  5. Algorand (ALGO) - Provider: Partial Need: Complete & bridge

  6. Tezos (XTZ) - Provider: ✓ Need: Bridge service

  7. Stellar (XLM) - Provider: Partial Need: Complete & bridge

Integration Effort: MODERATE (2-3 weeks each) Method: Implement IOASISBridge interface in existing providers Funding Potential: 7 × $42K = $294,000


Tier 4: NEW - Need Provider Development (10 Chains)

Major chains requiring new providers:

  1. Ripple (XRP) - Payment-focused, unique architecture

  2. Litecoin (LTC) - Bitcoin-like, UTXO model

  3. Bitcoin Cash (BCH) - Bitcoin fork, UTXO

  4. Monero (XMR) - Privacy-focused

  5. Tron (TRX) - High throughput, DPoS

  6. EOS (EOS) - DPoS consensus

  7. Internet Computer (ICP) - Unique canister architecture

  8. Hedera (HBAR) - Hashgraph consensus

  9. Elrond/MultiversX (EGLD) - Adaptive state sharding

  10. Flow (FLOW) - NFT-focused architecture

Integration Effort: HIGH (4-6 weeks each) Method: New provider implementations from scratch Funding Potential: 10 × $42K = $420,000


Total Funding Projection

42 chains × $42,000 each = $1,764,000

This is THE answer. Literally.


Integration Timeline

Phase 1: Complete Tier 1 (DONE) - ✓

  • 10 chains operational

  • Universal bridge functional

  • Frontend demonstrable

Phase 2: EVM Expansion (3 months)

  • Add 15 EVM-compatible chains

  • Parallel development (5 at a time)

  • Target: 25 total chains

Phase 3: Existing Provider Bridges (2 months)

  • Add bridge services to 7 existing providers

  • Leverage current codebase

  • Target: 32 total chains

Phase 4: New Provider Development (6 months)

  • Build 10 new providers from scratch

  • Focus on highest market cap first

  • Target: 42 total chains

Total Timeline: 11 months to full 42-chain integration


Technical Integration Strategy

For EVM Chains (Tier 2):

// Template: Copy any existing EVM provider
public sealed class zkSyncOASIS : Web3CoreOASISBaseProvider
{
    // Change RPC URL
    private const string MAINNET_RPC = "https://mainnet.era.zksync.io";
    private const string TESTNET_RPC = "https://testnet.era.zksync.dev";
    
    // Change Chain ID
    private const int MAINNET_CHAIN_ID = 324;
    private const int TESTNET_CHAIN_ID = 280;
    
    // Rest is identical to Ethereum/Polygon/Base pattern
}

Integration per chain: 1-2 weeks Can be done in parallel: 5 devs × 3 chains each = 15 chains in 3 weeks

For Existing Providers (Tier 3):

// Example: CardanoOASIS already exists
public sealed class CardanoOASIS : IOASISBridge
{
    // Add this interface
    public ICardanoBridgeService BridgeService { get; }
    
    // Implement bridge methods
    public Task<decimal> GetAccountBalanceAsync(string address) { }
    public Task<string> DepositAsync(decimal amount, string toAddress) { }
    public Task<string> WithdrawAsync(decimal amount, string toAddress) { }
}

Integration per chain: 2-3 weeks

For New Providers (Tier 4):

Full provider development required:

  • Wallet integration

  • Transaction handling

  • Smart contract support (if applicable)

  • Bridge service implementation

  • Testing suite

Integration per chain: 4-6 weeks


Prioritization by Market Cap & Usage

Priority 1 (Tier 2 - Quick Wins):

  1. zkSync Era - $500M+ TVL, fast growing

  2. Linea - Consensys backing, strong ecosystem

  3. Moonbeam - Polkadot bridge to EVM

  4. Celo - Mobile focus, global adoption

  5. Cronos - Crypto.com exchange integration

Priority 2 (Tier 3 - Leverage Existing):

  1. Cardano - #8 by market cap, large community

  2. Polkadot - #11 by market cap, interoperability focus

  3. NEAR - Developer-friendly, growing fast

  4. Cosmos - IBC standard, multiple app chains

  5. Algorand - Institutional adoption

Priority 3 (Tier 4 - Major Impact):

  1. Ripple (XRP) - #6 by market cap, institutional focus

  2. Litecoin - #20 by market cap, long history

  3. Tron - Large Asian market presence

  4. Internet Computer - Unique architecture, DFINITY backing

  5. Hedera - Enterprise adoption, council members


Developer Resources Required

Current Team (10 Chains):

  • 1-2 developers

  • Part-time effort

For 42 Chains:

  • 3-5 full-time developers for 11 months

  • OR Outsource to OASIS community (bounty program)

  • OR Each foundation contributes dev resources

Funding Model:

  • Each foundation pays $42K

  • Part goes to OASIS development

  • Part goes to provider-specific integration

  • Each foundation gets their chain prioritized


Foundation Pitch - Updated

Before (20 Chains):

"Join 19 other foundations, pay $42K, get a universal token across 20 chains"

After (42 Chains):

"Join 41 other foundations, pay $42K, get a universal token across all 42 major blockchains"

Benefits:

  • Your chain connects to 41 others instantly

  • Users can move assets freely

  • No lock-in to any single ecosystem

  • HyperDrive auto-failover across all 42 chains

  • Shared $1.76M development budget

  • The Answer to Everything: 42


Smart Contracts Required

EVM Chains (26 total):

  • 1 universal bridge contract

  • Deployable to all EVM chains

  • Same code, different addresses

Non-EVM Chains (16 total):

  • Chain-specific implementations

  • Cardano: Plutus contracts

  • Solana: Rust programs (already have)

  • Polkadot: ink! contracts

  • Cosmos: CosmWasm contracts

  • NEAR: Rust contracts

  • Others: As per chain requirements


Testing Strategy

Testnets (All 42):

Every chain integration includes:

  • Testnet deployment first

  • Faucet access documented

  • Full test suite

  • Cross-chain swap testing

Staging Environment:

  • 42 testnet connections

  • Mock bridge for rapid testing

  • CI/CD pipeline per chain

Production Rollout:

  • 5 chains at a time

  • Monitor for 1 week each batch

  • Full security audits

  • Bug bounty program


Economic Model

Per Foundation ($42K):

  • $20K: Core OASIS development

  • $15K: Chain-specific provider development

  • $5K: Testing & security audits

  • $2K: Documentation & support

Total Budget ($1.764M):

  • $840K: Core platform (HyperDrive, bridge architecture)

  • $630K: Provider development (42 chains)

  • $210K: Security audits & testing

  • $84K: Documentation, marketing, community


The 42 Chain Ecosystem Map

By Consensus:

  • Proof of Work: Bitcoin (if added later), Ethereum Classic

  • Proof of Stake: Ethereum, Cardano, Polkadot, Algorand, Tezos

  • DPoS: EOS, Tron

  • Unique: Hedera (Hashgraph), Internet Computer (Chain Key)

By Purpose:

  • DeFi: Ethereum, Avalanche, Fantom, Arbitrum

  • Payments: Ripple, Stellar, Litecoin

  • NFTs: Flow, Tezos, Polygon

  • Enterprise: Hedera, Cardano, Polkadot

  • Gaming: Immutable X, Ronin (if added)

  • Privacy: Monero

  • Storage: Filecoin (if added)

By Geography:

  • Global: Ethereum, Bitcoin

  • North America: Base, Avalanche

  • Europe: Polkadot, Cardano

  • Asia: BNB Chain, Tron

  • Emerging: Celo, Stellar


Competitive Advantage

Current Multi-Chain Bridges:

  • Wormhole: ~30 chains

  • LayerZero: ~40 chains

  • Axelar: ~45 chains

OASIS Web4 (42 Chains):

  • Better: Native existence via HyperDrive (not just bridging)

  • Safer: Auto-failover across all chains

  • Unique: Tokens exist simultaneously on all chains

  • Proven: 10 chains already working

  • Hitchhiker's Themed: The answer is 42!


Risk Mitigation

Technical Risks:

  • Mitigation: Extensive testing per chain

  • Fallback: HyperDrive auto-failover to working chains

  • Insurance: Bug bounty + audit program

Economic Risks:

  • Mitigation: Phased rollout (10 → 25 → 32 → 42)

  • Fallback: Each chain is independently valuable

  • Insurance: Foundation commitments spread over time

Adoption Risks:

  • Mitigation: Start with top 10 by market cap

  • Fallback: Even 20 chains is revolutionary

  • Insurance: Each additional chain increases value


Marketing Angle

The Pitch:

"We're building THE answer to blockchain fragmentation: 42 chains."

H2G2 Tie-In:

  • Don't Panic: HyperDrive handles all complexity

  • Babel Fish: Universal translation between all chains

  • 42: The answer to life, universe, and blockchain interoperability

  • Towel: Always know where your assets are (all 42 chains)

Press Release:

"OASIS announces Hitchhiker's Guide partnership: 42-chain universal token system - the answer to everything"


Next Steps - Immediate

Week 1-2:

  1. ✓ Update pitch deck: 20 chains → 42 chains

  2. ✓ Update funding ask: $840K → $1.764M

  3. Create 42-chain roadmap presentation

  4. Identify first 5 EVM chains to add

Week 3-4:

  1. Begin zkSync integration (highest priority)

  2. Start Linea integration

  3. Complete Cardano bridge service

  4. Update demo to show "10 of 42 chains live"

Month 2-3:

  1. Launch with 15 EVM chains (25 total)

  2. Foundation outreach: "Join the 42"

  3. Developer bounty program for remaining chains

  4. Security audits for new integrations


Success Metrics

Adoption:

  • 42 foundations sign on

  • $1.764M in funding

  • 1M+ transactions across all chains

Technical:

  • <2s cross-chain swap time

  • 99.9% uptime across all chains

  • Zero security incidents

Impact:

  • Most interoperable blockchain platform ever built

  • Standard for multi-chain token existence

  • Hitchhiker's Guide collaboration shipped


The Bottom Line

David is right: 42 is THE number.

  • It's thematically perfect for H2G2

  • It covers virtually every major blockchain

  • It generates $1.764M in funding

  • It makes OASIS the definitive multi-chain platform

  • It's the answer to everything

Let's build it.


Status: Ready to pitch 42 chains Timeline: 11 months to full integration Funding: $1,764,000 (42 × $42K) First target: 25 chains by Q1 2025

Don't Panic. We've got the Babel Fish. And the answer is 42.

Last updated